<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic &amp;quot;Liquid contamination&amp;quot; invalidates Vaio warranty in PCs &amp; Accessories</title>
    <link>https://community.sony.dk/t5/pcs-accessories/quot-liquid-contamination-quot-invalidates-vaio-warranty/m-p/1331176#M131657</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Having returned my Vaio for repair (battery fails to charge), I have been informed that Sony will not honour my warranty because of "liquid contamination".&amp;nbsp; I understand the term, and equally can understand why computer companies exclude damage resulting from spilled drinks, etc. from warranty coverage (I work in the industry).&amp;nbsp; However, I defy anyone to explain how the "liquid contamination" in the following photos (taken by the Sony repair team) justifies the "excluded from warranty" decision:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;photos: &lt;A target="_blank" href="https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1884164/1264413.zip"&gt;https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1884164/1264413.zip&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is my eyesight failing?&amp;nbsp; Can anyone see liquid contamination which is anywhere near any electrical components?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2013 14:44:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ogilviea</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-09-10T14:44:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>"Liquid contamination" invalidates Vaio warranty</title>
      <link>https://community.sony.dk/t5/pcs-accessories/quot-liquid-contamination-quot-invalidates-vaio-warranty/m-p/1331176#M131657</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Having returned my Vaio for repair (battery fails to charge), I have been informed that Sony will not honour my warranty because of "liquid contamination".&amp;nbsp; I understand the term, and equally can understand why computer companies exclude damage resulting from spilled drinks, etc. from warranty coverage (I work in the industry).&amp;nbsp; However, I defy anyone to explain how the "liquid contamination" in the following photos (taken by the Sony repair team) justifies the "excluded from warranty" decision:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;photos: &lt;A target="_blank" href="https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1884164/1264413.zip"&gt;https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1884164/1264413.zip&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is my eyesight failing?&amp;nbsp; Can anyone see liquid contamination which is anywhere near any electrical components?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2013 14:44:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.sony.dk/t5/pcs-accessories/quot-liquid-contamination-quot-invalidates-vaio-warranty/m-p/1331176#M131657</guid>
      <dc:creator>ogilviea</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-10T14:44:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

